Morrissey-solo
Archive

The Smiths "The CD Collector's Box" released on Feb. 16

posted by davidt on Wednesday February 11 2009, @11:00AM
Guillaume METAYER writes:
What is that ??

The CD Collector's Box [Box set] - Amazon.co.uk

# Audio CD (16 Feb 2009)
# Number of Discs: 3
# Format: Box set
# Label: Chrome Dreams
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Smiths "The CD Collector's Box" released on Feb. 16 | Top | 14 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • You had me going thinking this was somethign worth buying. Then I read "Chrome Dreams" FUCK them. Theyve put out nothing but garbage! Ive been duped by then more than twice. STAY AWAY save your money.
    Gin N Tonic Jil -- Wednesday February 11 2009, @11:06AM (#320784)
    (User #7276 Info)
    You're not down with who I am but, look at you now you're all in my hands...tonight I'm a Rock N' Roll Star!!
  • This must be a hoax, at least the cover. Why should Craig Gannon be on there but not Johnny Marr?!
    CarlCarlsson -- Wednesday February 11 2009, @11:07AM (#320785)
    (User #14091 Info)
  • And what's with the cover? I like Gannon, but, um, where's John?

    A shambles in every possible way.
    eugenius -- Wednesday February 11 2009, @11:23AM (#320789)
    (User #1665 Info | http://www.cherryplucker.com/)
    I'm almost sure you can do better than that.
  • this is morrissey performing last of....

    not the smithssss
    Anonymous -- Wednesday February 11 2009, @11:24AM (#320790)
  • This must be a hoax, at least the cover. Why should Craig Gannon be on there but not Johnny Marr?!
    CarlCarlsson -- Wednesday February 11 2009, @10:07AM (#320785)

    And what's with the cover? I like Gannon, but, um, where's John?
    A shambles in every possible way.
    eugenius -- Wednesday February 11 2009, @10:23AM (#320789)

    Thank you for posting CarlCarlsson and eugenius. My thoughts exactly. Doesn't deserve to be on the front page!
    Anonymous -- Wednesday February 11 2009, @11:37AM (#320793)
  • The smiths were all about morrissey
    ok, its not right that marr's not on cover
    but the only reason I Ever liked the smiths was morrissey -
    what exactly has marr done
    the last 20 yrs ??- enough said !!
    His light went out w` the smiths.
    The only time he is ever mentioned is...
    regarding getting back with Morrissey
    markmustb1 -- Wednesday February 11 2009, @11:59AM (#320794)
    (User #13161 Info)
    cos no one ever turns to me to say ...

  • Why? (Score:2, Informative)

    Well.. it seems good.
    But why they had put at cover a photo from Morrissey's solo career?

    It was at TOTP, and he was performing "The Last of the Famous..."
    Raphael Lambach -- Wednesday February 11 2009, @03:57PM (#320856)
    (User #21962 Info | http://www.raphaellambach.tk/)
    • Re:Why? by Anonymous (Score:0) Thursday February 12 2009, @04:16PM
  • which committed 2 crimes
    1) that this picture, which is clearly from last of the famous playboys era and not the smiths
    2) and they were charging like 30 bucks.

    the third crime could have been that i was actually in urban outfitters
    rooneyred -- Wednesday February 11 2009, @07:38PM (#320882)
    (User #17066 Info)
  • on top of the pops, Jan 89.
    Anonymous -- Thursday February 12 2009, @04:39AM (#320907)

[ home | terms of service ]