Morrissey the 23rd
October 27, 2008, 08:41 AM
This is a thread for you to post your tributes to the late Grim O'Grady.
|
View Full Version : Grim O'Grady Morrissey the 23rd October 27, 2008, 08:41 AM This is a thread for you to post your tributes to the late Grim O'Grady. Morrissey the 23rd October 27, 2008, 08:44 AM What word would you use to describe Steakpie? Theo October 27, 2008, 09:55 AM Grim's a commie bastard, but he's a piece of work and that's cool. I'll kinda miss him insulting me. I'll be bowing out of here soon, too. jesuisbryony October 27, 2008, 10:18 AM I'll be bowing out of here soon, too. Party? :rolleyes: Not Right in the Head October 27, 2008, 01:59 PM This is a thread for you to post your tributes to the late Grim O'Grady. When was his resignation announced? :confused: I like Grim. He's one of the many characters that gives this place life. Is he moving over to TCM's new forum? Oh, and why was Hugh banned this time? nugz October 27, 2008, 02:35 PM When was his resignation announced? :confused: I like Grim. He's one of the many characters that gives this place life. Is he moving over to TCM's new forum? Oh, and why was Hugh banned this time? I believe Grim was banned. everyone is getting banned this month. its like the great Solo massacre of 08! Kewpie October 27, 2008, 02:56 PM When was his resignation announced? :confused: I like Grim. He's one of the many characters that gives this place life. Is he moving over to TCM's new forum? Oh, and why was Hugh banned this time? If you look off-topic, you notice M23 posted three threads this morning which are harassment. Peter was online and deleted one, I merged the other one with this. Peter gave M23 for a 3 day time out. If M23 will not stop misbehaving on the forums he'll be banned. On Saturday 18th October a user Slum Mum made posts which were also harassment. After banning Slum Mum, the user made four attempts to repeat the same action. Moderators identified Slum Mum was actually Grim/GU. David decided to ban their account because of their misbehaviour. It is very disrespectful to call it as a massacre. If a user become abusive towards other user, he/she will be banned from the forums. nugz October 27, 2008, 02:57 PM If you look off-topic, you notice M23 posted three threads this morning which are harassment. Peter was online and deleted one, I merged the other one with this. Peter gave M23 for a 3 day time out. If M23 will not stop misbehaving on the forums he'll be banned. On Saturday 18th October a user Slum Mum made posts which were also harassment. After banning Slum Mum, the user made four attempts to repeat the same action. Moderators identified Slum Mum was actually Grim/GU. David decided to ban their account because of their misbehaviour. It is very disrespectful to call it as a massacre. If a user become abusive towards other user, he/she will be banned from the forums. kewps, chill. it was just a joke. Sharron Needles October 27, 2008, 03:00 PM God, this place is becoming more and more like Morrissey Music.:rolleyes: Kewpie October 27, 2008, 03:04 PM God, this place is becoming more and more like Morrissey Music.:rolleyes: Don't be silly, you didn't witness what actually happened. Sharron Needles October 27, 2008, 03:06 PM Don't be silly, you didn't witness what actually happened. No, you're right... But I'm speaking of all of the drama. Jane Birkin October 27, 2008, 05:43 PM Ya Vol, Mein Fuhrer ThisCharmingGirl October 27, 2008, 05:52 PM I like Grim. He's one of the many characters that gives this place life. I agree. This place isn't the same without him. I don't know why he was banned but I don't think it was that serious :eek: :confused: Same for M23. Uncleskinny October 27, 2008, 05:52 PM I'll tell you why Hugh was given a time-out. He posted a picture of Hitler in a post about Kewpie and said "Does this remind you of anyone?". In my book that constitutes harasssment of another user, and insulting another user. It's out of order. I like Hugh, I like Hugh a lot, but this was over-stepping the mark, and I can't make exceptions for people I like. Peter Jane Birkin October 27, 2008, 05:57 PM I'll tell you why Hugh was given a time-out. He posted a picture of Hitler in a post about Kewpie and said "Does this remind you of anyone?". In my book that constitutes harasssment of another user, and insulting another user. It's out of order. I like Hugh, I like Hugh a lot, but this was over-stepping the mark, and I can't make exceptions for people I like. Peter omg!!!!! wtf is wrong with everyone these days?????????? Could we all chill the fuck out and stop acting like a bunch of humourless twats! Moz would be appalled. ohbutwait, he already is by this website. PEACE AND LOVE EVERYONE. PEACE AND FUCKING LOVE. vicarinatutugal October 27, 2008, 06:00 PM omg!!!!! wtf is wrong with everyone these days?????????? Could we all chill the fuck out and stop acting like a bunch of humourless twats! Moz would be appalled. ohbutwait, he already is by this website. PEACE AND LOVE EVERYONE. PEACE AND FUCKING LOVE. There was nothing funny about that. There should be no debate on it. Not everyone is humourless here. Uncleskinny October 27, 2008, 06:01 PM omg!!!!! wtf is wrong with everyone these days?????????? Could we all chill the fuck out and stop acting like a bunch of humourless twats! Moz would be appalled. ohbutwait, he already is by this website. PEACE AND LOVE EVERYONE. PEACE AND FUCKING LOVE. So you're saying it's OK to invoke Godwin's Law, and compare board members to Hitler? Peter Jane Birkin October 27, 2008, 06:03 PM So you're saying it's OK to invoke Godwin's Law, and compare board members to Hitler? Peter No, all I'm saying is that they are just words. Could we all just calm down, we're all friends here. Jane Birkin October 27, 2008, 06:06 PM There was nothing funny about that. There should be no debate on it. Not everyone is humourless here. Glad to hear that not everyone is humourless around here, I certainly don't think you are, but let's put things into perspective here, NOONE DIED. sarahT October 27, 2008, 06:19 PM , NOONE DIED. What, Peter Noone? vicarinatutugal October 27, 2008, 06:19 PM Glad to hear that not everyone is humourless around here, I certainly don't think you are, but let's put things into perspective here, NOONE DIED. prefect point. So these threads and stuff are totally pointless! however if you are all madly missing grim he is his usual cheery self over on The wrong arms (http://thewrongarms.proboards.com/index.cgi?) Jane Birkin October 27, 2008, 06:24 PM What, Peter Noone? nah it was his brother, Martin. sarahT October 27, 2008, 06:25 PM nah it was his brother, Martin. Ooh thank the Lord. vivabob October 27, 2008, 06:50 PM could everyone just stop getting f"£kin banned !!!!!! lottie October 27, 2008, 06:59 PM If you look off-topic, you notice M23 posted three threads this morning which are harassment. Peter was online and deleted one, I merged the other one with this. Peter gave M23 for a 3 day time out. If M23 will not stop misbehaving on the forums he'll be banned. On Saturday 18th October a user Slum Mum made posts which were also harassment. After banning Slum Mum, the user made four attempts to repeat the same action. Moderators identified Slum Mum was actually Grim/GU. David decided to ban their account because of their misbehaviour. It is very disrespectful to call it as a massacre. If a user become abusive towards other user, he/she will be banned from the forums. wow, Kewpie you get a gold star for actually replying and explaining properly what, who and why, THANKYOU. Its all getting a bit too petty round here though, talk about holding grudges, Geez, certain people (and no i will not name names) need to remember that life is but a jot and shouldnt be wasted, (says she who on here instead of cooking dinner :o) Dave October 27, 2008, 07:29 PM So you're saying it's OK to invoke Godwin's Law, and compare board members to Hitler? Peter I'll say this. If I were compared to Hitler I wouldn't mind, because the comparison is a farce. In the public eye, in my opinion and the opinions of a few others that discussed this in chat, Kewpie, in some ways, benefits from the constant whining silly attacks on her. After a while the people complaining all get "tarred with the same brush" and it's hard to tell a legitimate complaint, of which there have been a few, with someone talking about Hitler. the beast October 27, 2008, 07:34 PM i share my birthday with hitler:eek: just a piece of useless information:( Theo October 27, 2008, 09:02 PM LOL! Now you're banned for comparing someone to Hitler! Well, like the mods warned when they publicized their enemies list immediately before this wave of bannings: The people on it had better watch what they say. The zero tolerance policy is in effect. LE is cracking down. A chilly wind is blowing through SoLow. Buzzetta October 27, 2008, 09:26 PM LOL! Now you're banned for comparing someone to Hitler! Well, like the mods warned when they publicized their enemies list immediately before this wave of bannings: The people on it had better watch what they say. The zero tolerance policy is in effect. LE is cracking down. A chilly wind is blowing through SoLow. I am a model citizen. If I state it enough times someone will believe it. Oh my god, it's Robby! October 27, 2008, 09:43 PM some people need to be banned because they simply do not realize how embarrassed they should be by their invoking of Godwin's law* i mean thats a textbook troll move from like 20 years ago :cool: http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y86/gulrober/Nazi/nazipigeoncopy.jpg *=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law SNS22 October 28, 2008, 04:52 AM I'll tell you why Hugh was given a time-out. He posted a picture of Hitler in a post about Kewpie and said "Does this remind you of anyone?". In my book that constitutes harasssment of another user, and insulting another user. It's out of order. I like Hugh, I like Hugh a lot, but this was over-stepping the mark, and I can't make exceptions for people I like. Peter Hey, It was firmly established last summer that posting pictures of Nazi even in a sarcastic manner isn't cool. I'm still chafing from that one, but you won't see me doing it again. Dave has taught me that posting photos of communists is okay though. SNS22 October 28, 2008, 04:53 AM prefect point. So these threads and stuff are totally pointless! however if you are all madly missing grim he is his usual cheery self over on The wrong arms (http://thewrongarms.proboards.com/index.cgi?) Until he gets banned over there LOL davidt October 28, 2008, 05:00 AM LOL! Now you're banned for comparing someone to Hitler! Well, like the mods warned when they publicized their enemies list immediately before this wave of bannings: The people on it had better watch what they say. The zero tolerance policy is in effect. LE is cracking down. A chilly wind is blowing through SoLow. It wasn't just that comparison. The user has been harassing the mod for the last several weeks and was asking for it with that trolling post. Glorified_Umbrella October 28, 2008, 01:15 PM If you look off-topic, you notice M23 posted three threads this morning which are harassment. Peter was online and deleted one, I merged the other one with this. Peter gave M23 for a 3 day time out. If M23 will not stop misbehaving on the forums he'll be banned. On Saturday 18th October a user Slum Mum made posts which were also harassment. After banning Slum Mum, the user made four attempts to repeat the same action. Moderators identified Slum Mum was actually Grim/GU. David decided to ban their account because of their misbehaviour. It is very disrespectful to call it as a massacre. If a user become abusive towards other user, he/she will be banned from the forums. He decided to ban their accountS cos of their misbehavior. It's hardly fair, it couldn't have been two people doing it at once, especially as you know one of them was on another forum at the time. Fair enough, ban GU, for posting a picture that is widely available on the internet, but why Grim too? I am not abusive. In fact I have had my picture plastered over this site without my permission. Did DavidT ban the people responsible for that? did he fuck as like!! Or if he did, they kept creeping back with another ID. It's a shame to do this, but if you feel the need to call people TROLLS, then they might start acting like one. Off to post member/mod pictures on a fetish website now (no not YOU Unkle skinny) Not Right in the Head October 28, 2008, 02:43 PM He decided to ban their accountS cos of their misbehavior. It's hardly fair, it couldn't have been two people doing it at once, especially as you know one of them was on another forum at the time. Fair enough, ban GU, for posting a picture that is widely available on the internet, but why Grim too? I am not abusive. In fact I have had my picture plastered over this site without my permission. Did DavidT ban the people responsible for that? did he fuck as like!! Or if he did, they kept creeping back with another ID. It's a shame to do this, but if you feel the need to call people TROLLS, then they might start acting like one. Off to post member/mod pictures on a fetish website now (no not YOU Unkle skinny) Love the new username. :D Buzzetta October 28, 2008, 04:00 PM Every time I see "Grim O' Grady" I cannot help but remember the Bugs Bunny Cartoon "A Hare Grows in Manhattan." You know the one where Bugs is all dressed up singing: I'm da daughtah of Row-sie Oh Gray-deeeee A Luv-ah-lee ole fashined goil Could someone find that and post it please? Uncleskinny October 28, 2008, 04:05 PM Every time I see "Grim O' Grady" I cannot help but remember the Bugs Bunny Cartoon "A Hare Grows in Manhattan." You know the one where Bugs is all dressed up singing: I'm da daughtah of Row-sie Oh Gray-deeeee A Luv-ah-lee ole fashined goil Could someone find that and post it please? This one... sdXcUzhxoHs Peter Buzzetta October 28, 2008, 10:42 PM This one... sdXcUzhxoHs Peter Thank's Peter - I have no direct access to youtube and did not have the computer handy that we "doctored" to gain access to everything. I love that cartoon. Dogpile on the rabbit indeed. Morrissey the 23rd October 30, 2008, 03:41 PM If you look off-topic, you notice M23 posted three threads this morning which are harassment. Peter was online and deleted one, I merged the other one with this. Peter gave M23 for a 3 day time out. If M23 will not stop misbehaving on the forums he'll be banned. On Saturday 18th October a user Slum Mum made posts which were also harassment. After banning Slum Mum, the user made four attempts to repeat the same action. Moderators identified Slum Mum was actually Grim/GU. David decided to ban their account because of their misbehaviour. It is very disrespectful to call it as a massacre. If a user become abusive towards other user, he/she will be banned from the forums. Have any of you reading this found these said three post which were harassment? Me neither. I'll tell you why Hugh was given a time-out. He posted a picture of Hitler in a post about Kewpie and said "Does this remind you of anyone?". In my book that constitutes harasssment of another user, and insulting another user. It's out of order. I like Hugh, I like Hugh a lot, but this was over-stepping the mark, and I can't make exceptions for people I like. Peter There was no mention of Kewpie. Why does Hilter reminded you of Kewpie? There was nothing funny about that. There should be no debate on it. Not everyone is humourless here. My thoughts previously: http://forums.morrissey-solo.com/showpost.php?p=912429&postcount=82 So you're saying it's OK to invoke Godwin's Law, and compare board members to Hitler? Peter It was not me who made that comparison. You did. some people need to be banned because they simply do not realize how embarrassed they should be by their invoking of Godwin's law* i mean thats a textbook troll move from like 20 years ago :cool: http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y86/gulrober/Nazi/nazipigeoncopy.jpg *=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law I don't want you banned too. If So-low practised equality, you'd have been given an infraction too for posting a non-glorifying nazi image. What if a mod had make a connection of harassment in their head? Hey, It was firmly established last summer that posting pictures of Nazi even in a sarcastic manner isn't cool. I'm still chafing from that one, but you won't see me doing it again. Dave has taught me that posting photos of communists is okay though. I think it was established it is only ok if you make posts glorifying nazi's or create user names of famous nazi's. It wasn't just that comparison. The user has been harassing the mod for the last several weeks and was asking for it with that trolling post. So, the photo of hitler also made you think of Hitler? Dear, dear! I was thinking of Masefield. I made no mention of Kewpie. I can think of harassment from her to me. How about you Blinker boy? He decided to ban their accountS cos of their misbehavior. It's hardly fair, it couldn't have been two people doing it at once, especially as you know one of them was on another forum at the time. Fair enough, ban GU, for posting a picture that is widely available on the internet, but why Grim too? I am not abusive. In fact I have had my picture plastered over this site without my permission. Did DavidT ban the people responsible for that? did he fuck as like!! Or if he did, they kept creeping back with another ID. It's a shame to do this, but if you feel the need to call people TROLLS, then they might start acting like one. Off to post member/mod pictures on a fetish website now (no not YOU Unkle skinny) Good points but don't expect fairness or equallity here. Morrissey the 23rd October 30, 2008, 03:42 PM Subject: Who pulled the plug on me? Date: 27/10/2008 09:40:04 GMT Standard Time From: Morrisseythe23rd To: Uncleskinny, vicarinatutugal, Sphinx, DavidT and why exactly? H Date: 27/10/2008 17:44:46 GMT Standard Time From: To: vicarinatutugal, Hi there Hugh your infraction will expire in 3 days its a time out. I think you know what it was for so even writing this bothers me but anyway incase you forgot You posted a thread with a pic in it and were infracted against due to that. You will have a PM in your in box explaining the infraction, which you can see when you get back on. thats it as far as I can see it. hope you are ok. Karin (are you coming on to Kate's site http://thewrongarms.proboards.com/index.cgi? Date: 27/10/2008 21:04:43 GMT Standard Time From: Morrisseythe23rd Thanks for taking the time to reply Karin. Either Peter's balls or his manners have shrivelled completely up David's arse, along with his sense of humour. I'm pissed off. Hope you're well. We both know why I was really sent to the naughty step. I remember all my posts clearly. None broke TOS but that isn't important in the So-low kangaroo court. Apparently there are three valid examples to be found in 'Off topic'. Can I see them and what TOS they broke? Tensions have escalated further and the current impasse looks less likely to ever be resolved. It's inevitable that I will respond to what I see as unjust and the Solo mods aren't really going to care that Hugh Clark is pissed off. I don't think David cares about anything at all. My understanding now is only photographs glorifying nazi's can be posted on solo. We kind of knew that anyway going on history. It's kind of funny to be banned for posting a look-a-like of Masefield. What my dislike of steak pies has to do with Grim, I've no idea. Even the thread I started about the Moz wannabe was merged. I'm fine with that but look at the new threads posted today that should have been merged but weren't. We know the reason mine was and the others weren't. The reason I've not popped into The wrong arms for a pint is, well, my desire to pour a pint of my own piss over Kewpie isn't going to weaken there. It's seems to be the bastard child from a one-night stand with solo. It would depend on how Kate runs her site, the people that serve it and the members that use it. I'd need to see a difference from So-low. I wish it lots of success. Also, I don't see why David, Peter and Kewpie's ignorance should exclude me from the Morrissey community. Which, effectively they have to a large extent and that wasn't the smart answer. That will only be effective against 'Morrissey the 23rd'. To paraphrase Lincoln, to sin by silence when I should protest would make me a coward. As Skywalker said to Vader, 'Never!'. While writing this while in-between making and eating dinner, posts have obviously carried on and I need to respond to what I've read: There were no posts about Kewpie. In court, you'd have to present acceptable evidence. What you have is a belief. There is a massive difference. Doesn't calling Theo a wanker constitute harassment? I'm struggling to see that as anything other than directly insulting another user. Well, it is in my book and it is out-of-order. The different rules for different people will continue to cause friction on So-low. It is even kind of fascist eh? Your action has also seriously damaged our friendship Peter. I must say Karin. That is a mighty big statement for you to decide what is funny and what isn't. My thoughts previously: http://forums.morrissey-solo.com/showpost.php?p=912429&postcount=82 It is good to see Kewpie finally making an effort to explain. Love, peace and harmony? Aye right! Morrissey the 23rd October 30, 2008, 03:43 PM Date: 27/10/2008 21:56:52 GMT Standard Time From: Uncleskinny, Ok Hugh, I'll tell you why I pushed the button. You made three posts in a row, all thinly-veiled posts about Kewpie, one compared her to Hitler. Taken in isolation, they might be innocent, but you knew what you were doing, and it's disappointing in a way you felt you had to do this. I like you very much Hugh, I really do, but you must understand that I, and the other mods do our best to play by the rules. I would have done the same no matter who the poster had been. I'm a very simple man, and I've been told I'm very simple. I just want people to be nice. It's not a ban, it's a time-out. You were not given a time out for posting a picture of someone, it was for the combination of the posting and the intent, which, to me, was very clear. You must have know it wasn't fair. I wish you all the best, and the next time I see you I'll buy you a few pints and talk about anything you want. Love, Petre Date: 28/10/2008 00:20:22 GMT Standard Time From: Morrisseythe23rd The route of the problem is that rules the are not applied equally and that disappoints me. You know that I am right. You know since Kewpie began... Yes, I've not forgotten the very important point of it was her who threw the first stone, then again, and again. ... you could have done more to stand up for what is right. Not just for me but in general. I've said nothing much about your silence. I've probably said more to Karin and I hardly know her. For whatever reason, you decided not to and that also disappoints me because you can't possibly think she is doing a decent job of it. I 'knew' it was you and that really angered me. So much so, I punched a hole in my wall leaving me with a sore fist. I felt really let down. I believe that being a friend made it easier for you. Knowing me, knowing what I am like but no TOS was broken. God help us if we start getting locked up for what we might do. I'd have been upset if David had taken the same action but not nearly as much. I honestly think Kewpie is mental and I pity her but I refuse to suffer because of her. I truly believe she tries hard and means well but that isn't enough, is it? If it was a business, she would have been managed out the door a long time ago. Everything in the end reflects on David and as it is his business, untimely I hold him responsible for everything. It is just a shame he couldn't give a fuck. Even after all the times Kewpie was a kaunt to me. When I saw her in London, how did I react? Then she did it again and when I again saw her in London? I even controlled verbal jokes from going in her direction. I was the nice guy that I try to be and kept a distance from her (to give her room). Given the chance, I would have expected her to go for me faster than she moves or deletes my posts but it was you who jumped in and I believe without understanding of what I posted. You became her patsy. Our apathetic fuhrer wouldn't let his nose get shit on it but you dived right in. I was talking from somebody from the Moz world on-line after it happened. He doesn't use Solo but is very, very aware of what goes on there. He said he felt the Mods are drunk on the small amount of power that they have and power corrupts, as their messiah complex sets in. At first, I thought that sounded a bit of a cliché but on reflection, I agree. He was in agreement with me that David doesn't care. In fact, it was him I ripped the shit on the nose line from. It is nice to be nice. Agreed. Respect is also nice but also a two-way street. The third time Kewpie was out of order, I had a little more to say. Pity others who should have had something to say while she span out-of-control, didn't. For all the years I posted here, the only person I've ever had a real issue with is Kewpie and I tried harder than I should have to resolve it. I'd be as well talking to my dented wall. I should never had posted a lot of what I have posted but I'm reactionary and also extremely sensitive. That is another failing for a mod - To make errors or decisions without an apology or explanation. Your wee gang can get together a make a pack decisions but everybody else is reading and judging and they are all part of the bigger, more important group. Would you really have banned anybody else for my posts today? Really? I don't believe you if you say you would have. There soon wouldn't be anybody left. If (rather than name names) you guys who maintain and run the site don't get your act together. All you are going to be left with is just the dross. Unlike most, some of my posts were about the artist that brings us together. Maybe what is wanted is more posts like, Is Santa real? and other posts of whatever inane thought is in the head at the time. Can you remember the last conversation we had (in person) about Solo? I can. You may have stood up for me in the background but you really should have been out there on the boards, standing up for the group as a collective. You shouldn't have had to because it shouldn't have been allowed. Having happened, David should have got involved to correct it but failing that, somebody should have. I guess it must be tougher to tell Mod friends when they are out-of-order. How would you react if you walked into your local and were banned for fuck all, just as I was? I did not break any TOS but collectively, you felt I needed to be brought down a peg or two. The sinner needed to be punished. Remember what I said in that conversation about how I'd react to that? I hope the new found fairness you speak of is practised and equally among all members. I hope you don't mind me copying in David but I want him to see the full picture, even if he doesn't. He is then completely responsible for what action he does or doesn't take on his site. H Date: 28/10/2008 00:37:08 GMT Standard Time From: DavidT I'm sorry you feel it is unfair but Peter's actions are correct and the same action I would have taken and others. "You know that I am right."... that sounds more Hitler-esque than anything kewpie has ever said. Frankly, my opinion is that you are wrong. You have long been harassing kewpie and this is a violation of the TOS. If anyone else had done the same they would have gotten the same infraction. Actually, since you have been a long-time user we have been lighter - you haven't been banned immediately. Moderation is not an exact science but if you want to be treated the same as any other random user I can give you a permanent ban if you like. I also reject your opinion that I 'don't give a fuck' as I continue to spend hours reading and responding to your complaints. If you tell me specifically what you want and back up your claims, I can give you a specific response. And don't say 'it's all there, just look'. Morrissey the 23rd October 30, 2008, 03:43 PM Date: 28/10/2008 16:51:27 GMT Standard Time From: Morrisseythe23rd Hi, I fully accept moderation is not an exact science. That is possibly one of the reasons the rules the are not applied equally but the law of averages would mean any injustice would balance itself out over time, unless prejudice is practised. You can claim it isn't, as is your right but we both do know better Fuhrer. You can also decide that the problem between Kewpie and myself is my creation but I proved it was hers. I also proved the attempts I made to stop it and the instances she continued to harass me unchecked by her peers. Blinker-boy. It is not a requirement of a Mod to desperately look for stuff to be righteously indignated by. Nor when there's nothing obvious to censor, is there a need to pretend to be shocked by next to nothing. I agree if I had not been a long time-user, I would have been treated differently and quite rightly. I am aware you have not banned me immediately but plan to do so in stages. You writing things like, do you want you money back? or I can give you a permanent ban if you like, or pull the trigger on you, as I have wrote previous bore me. They just demonstrate you to be a wank and you can only except a wanky response. It would be similar to writing, I could smash your face in if you like? Going out of your way to confrontationally say on the boards that you've banned Grim for a year is a demonstration of your double-standards, you champion of hand-picked trolls. I also see how you yet again did not respond to evidence. I could create various user-names and hide behind a proxy creating high levels of damage but I've only ever created one user name and played fair. I now know the process of how you change a general good guy to a troublesome troll and have a better understand of them and why they did/do as they do. Push me that way if you wish. Still, I appreciate what effort you do make. H Subject: Re: Steven Patrick Where Are You Now? Date: 29/10/2008 18:43:37 GMT Standard Time From: Morrisseythe23rd Hi, I appreciate the unmerging of this thread and Kewpie's apology. Please pass on my acceptance and thanks to her. This is most definitely a welcome step forward. Thanks! H Some people who in the past have received infractions may never have returned. Simply because the infraction has to expire then the user log in to discover it. That seems a strange way to do things to me. Here is my first disciplinary action ever against me on Morrissey-solo: You have received an infraction at Morrissey-solo Forums Uncleskinny Wrinkly Member Dear Morrissey the 23rd, You have received an infraction at Morrissey-solo Forums. Reason: Take a timeout ------- Come on Hugh, you know that is completely out of order. ------- This infraction is worth 3 point(s) and may result in restricted access until it expires. Serious infractions will never expire. Original Post: http://forums.morrissey-solo.com/showthread.php?p=1004353 Quote: Be honest. Who have you been reminded of? All the best, Morrissey-solo Forums Not Right in the Head October 30, 2008, 03:49 PM Nice knowing ya, Hugh. :( The Cat's Mother October 30, 2008, 04:59 PM The reason I've not popped into The wrong arms for a pint is, well, my desire to pour a pint of my own piss over Kewpie isn't going to weaken there. It's seems to be the bastard child from a one-night stand with solo. It would depend on how Kate runs her site, the people that serve it and the members that use it. Not particularly directed at Hugh, but since he raised the issue, here are the rules of The Wrong Arms. "In addition to the standard Proboards TOS, by applying to join The Wrong Arms forum you are agreeing to the following additional rules. Rules are subject to change because I get mood swings. 01. Don’t break the rules. It’ll get you banned. 02. Don’t be an arse. It’ll get you banned. 03. Understand that this is a privately run fan forum, not a democracy. Don’t play the entitlement card with me, Princess; I'll ban you for whatever reason I please. Especially if you bore me. And I bore easily. 04. Do NOT use this forum to play out feuds from other websites or forums. Whatever you've done elsewhere, you get a clean sheet when you come to The Wrong Arms. Don't mess things up for yourself or others by dragging in shit from elsewhere. 05. Constructive criticism of artists and their work is welcomed. Gratuitious slagging-off isn’t. This is a fan forum, remember? 06. Don’t troll, harrass, flame or stalk your fellow members. Bullying will not be tolerated. Unless it's me doing the bullying. Or unless I think it's funny. 07. Don’t advertise items for sale except on the appropriate boards. 08. Respect the laws of copyright. 09. Offensive, fatuous and otherwise crap threads will be locked and cast intoThe Sin Bin! (http://thewrongarms.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=sinbin) . I'll decide what's crap. 10. If you have less than 100 posts, any thread you start yourself will be held for moderation before other members can read it. Don't post 100 loads of drivel to try to get full thread posting rights asap or the mods will hold you back for being a twit; if your moderated threads are okay, they'll be approved anyway. Un-moderated thread posting access may be held back or revoked just because I feel like it. Or just because I can't be arsed to go tampering with the settings. Deal with it. 11. Re-read Rule 02 as many times as necessary. " So yes, it is being run "differently" to Solo. Be careful what you wish for.... :p Not Right in the Head October 30, 2008, 05:05 PM 04. Do NOT use this forum to play out feuds from other websites or forums. Whatever you've done elsewhere, you get a clean sheet when you come to The Wrong Arms. Don't mess things up for yourself or others by dragging in shit from elsewhere. Quite right. That's what the chatroom is for. Mike Mozfan October 30, 2008, 08:40 PM I agree there should be some sort of rules, but no one should be banned for expressing opinions, in this country (USA) it's the 1st amendment: the right to free speech. Now on the other hand, how ppl. react to the so-called offensive postings, that is THEIR problem! That is my 2 cents. When I started coming here in '99, not even the mods had this power and I think it is going to their heads, I am really surprised that David is buying intoo it, I thought he was smarter. And I am sorry, you can ban me for this, but I have seen Kewpie in chat and he/she is a bitch! :guitar: Kewpie October 30, 2008, 08:51 PM Do not spread false rumour Mike Mozfan. If you find a chatroom user Kewpie is abusive to others you can always report to chatmoderator@morrissey-solo.com Chatroom is infested by internet nutcases who are bitter twisted individuals. They have nothing better than insulting others. I was told that a loser was impersonating me using my forum user name. David and other moderators know I do not use chatroom. Ben Chill October 30, 2008, 09:06 PM I'm not getting involved in the rights and wrongs of all this, I have an opinion but quite frankly I've more pressing matters. I just wanted to say that Peter appears to me to be a most decent bloke trying to help run the best fan site in the world. It's a shame he appears in this drama. I have rarely met, in real life or on the internet, a better person. That's all. Won't help the debate, but I just wanted to say it. Goodnight. Not Right in the Head October 30, 2008, 09:14 PM I'm not getting involved in the rights and wrongs of all this, I have an opinion but quite frankly I've more pressing matters. I just wanted to say that Peter appears to me to be a most decent bloke trying to help run the best fan site in the world. It's a shame he appears in this drama. I have rarely met, in real life or on the internet, a better person. That's all. Won't help the debate, but I just wanted to say it. Goodnight. Good lord--you're banned now, too? Kewpie October 30, 2008, 09:23 PM Good lord--you're banned now, too? Nope, he removed his avatar and changed his tag, that's all. Not Right in the Head October 30, 2008, 09:25 PM Nope, he removed his avatar and changed his tag, that's all. Clever. I should try that sometime. Corrissey October 30, 2008, 09:29 PM Clever. I should try that sometime. Deja vu :p You were right, nobody cared... or believed me. ;) Kewpie October 30, 2008, 09:30 PM Clever. I should try that sometime. You used have a tag "banned" with a vehicle or tabasco label picture as your avatar. Not Right in the Head October 30, 2008, 09:34 PM You used have a tag "banned" with a vehicle or tabasco label picture as your avatar. I did? :confused: Cassius October 30, 2008, 09:41 PM I did? :confused: Yeah, I think you did. I think it was the tabasco sauce. Before you had banana'd and then you changed it to banned, and then I think boggy made a thread and pretended you were really banned. Oh my god, it's Robby! October 30, 2008, 10:36 PM Yeah, I think you did. I think it was the tabasco sauce. Before you had banana'd and then you changed it to banned, and then I think boggy made a thread and pretended you were really banned. somebody did that really? well that joke isnt funny anymore :cool: i already having a very hard time deciding how much effort to put into keeping track of who is banned and why so i dont accidentally stray from the straight and narrow* :eek: fake bannings is just too much to consider as well :confused: *=ok i am not that narrow yet, but these things take time :o ALLIE WALLS November 7, 2008, 11:50 PM I dont know them personally but i do feel there should be a discussion about why they were banned? surely? as i said i dont know the people involved but i do think its fair that a disussion is available maybe there was one and i missed it ?? so this is a place where we can talk about it unless as i assume its moved somewhere else. Alan Kewpie November 7, 2008, 11:55 PM Flax hasn't been banned, he stopped posting forums. If you go to site feedback, you find out about Grim. You also find Grim in The Wrong Arms (http://thewrongarms.proboards.com/index.cgi?/) vicarinatutugal November 7, 2008, 11:56 PM I dont know them personally but i do feel there should be a discussion about why they were banned? surely? as i said i dont know the people involved but i do think its fair that a disussion is available maybe there was one and i missed it ?? so this is a place where we can talk about it unless as i assume its moved somewhere else. Alan em flax is still allowed to post unless im too drunk and can't think straight, Grim knows the score with the other thing. He is ok really get him on Kates site. I am not sure if that reads ok, im drunk :sick: ALLIE WALLS November 8, 2008, 12:48 AM what it feels to me is that it s a certain moderators way of keeping people down who you dont agree with Alan Very Moz November 8, 2008, 05:03 AM If my opinion matters...If posting pictures is causing so much trouble, why don´t ban this instead of banning people, Is it a stupid solution? ban, insults, horrible pics (till banning) are welcome:) Later you can go on and ban letters, words, phrases, a whole post (is it happening right now?) etc,etc, so in the end we will have an empty beautiful forum and the most important: that won´t cause troubles!!! If someone´s post bothers me I would complain or would ignore it, I can take my own decisions about what to read or not as I did many times in the old times in the chat where I met adorable people whom still I am in touch with to these days, and I am not only talking about Hugh and Grim, but I am not going to give a list now as many of them don´t come here anymore. I feel sad about all this matter and it seems I am getting older as I feel old times were the best. Dave2006 November 8, 2008, 09:49 AM My heart has just sunk... I don't want to get caught up in a he said she said debate...but to discover there's another forum site where the same people have the same on-line names and talk about the same stuff and have the same arguments...is truly disappointing, truly, truly, truly I can understand why certain well known celebrities would want to protect their names...but to join in the conversations as well....surely there aren't enough hours in the day... Stephane November 8, 2008, 05:10 PM I'm disappointed to see the military state that this place has become. Davidt, I think moderators also need a bit of moderating. Kewpie has been making many users here unhappy for at least a year, maybe more. She was bound to push some more hot blooded people over their limits. The way she is dealing with this situation is also the sign of a bad moderator. It took me forever to find out why Grim and co were banned because Kewpie never answered my questions about it, and when I did find out I was disappointed to learn of the reason (which was a bit radical, but in my opinion didn't deserve banning because it was more or less called for, and should have been dealt with a bit more sense of humour). I believe banning should be reserved for new users who come here immediately causing trouble, or for repeat offenders. I also think moderators should listen to the other users. I'm just saying all this as an outisde observer, because nobody has offended me personally. I find Kewpie's way to dealing with the threads a bit annoying, but I can live with it. The people who get on my nerves I can always just put on my ignore list. I just hate to see the people I like to meet here every day get banned. For moderate moderation... please. I don't want to see anybody else disappear. iamkali November 8, 2008, 05:20 PM I'm disappointed to see the military state that this place has become. Davidt, I think moderators also need a bit of moderating. Kewpie has been making many users here unhappy for at least a year, maybe more. She was bound to push some more hot blooded people over their limits. The way she is dealing with this situation is also the sign of a bad moderator. It took me forever to find out why Grim and co were banned because Kewpie never answered my questions about it, and when I did find out I was disappointed to learn of the reason (which was a bit radical, but in my opinion didn't deserve banning because it was more or less called for, and should have been dealt with a bit more sense of humour). I believe banning should be reserved for new users who come here immediately causing trouble, or for repeat offenders. I also think moderators should listen to the other users. I'm just saying all this as an outisde observer, because nobody has offended me personally. I find Kewpie's way to dealing with the threads a bit annoying, but I can live with it. The people who get on my nerves I can always just put on my ignore list. I just hate to see the people I like to meet here every day get banned. For moderate moderation... please. I don't want to see anybody else disappear. Stephanie, What a great post! You took the words right out of my mouth (but presented them much better. Cheers! Kali Very Moz November 8, 2008, 06:04 PM I'm disappointed to see the military state that this place has become. Davidt, I think moderators also need a bit of moderating. Kewpie has been making many users here unhappy for at least a year, maybe more. She was bound to push some more hot blooded people over their limits. The way she is dealing with this situation is also the sign of a bad moderator. It took me forever to find out why Grim and co were banned because Kewpie never answered my questions about it, and when I did find out I was disappointed to learn of the reason (which was a bit radical, but in my opinion didn't deserve banning because it was more or less called for, and should have been dealt with a bit more sense of humour). I believe banning should be reserved for new users who come here immediately causing trouble, or for repeat offenders. I also think moderators should listen to the other users. I'm just saying all this as an outisde observer, because nobody has offended me personally. I find Kewpie's way to dealing with the threads a bit annoying, but I can live with it. The people who get on my nerves I can always just put on my ignore list. I just hate to see the people I like to meet here every day get banned. For moderate moderation... please. I don't want to see anybody else disappear. totally agree with it, perfect words, Stephane:) Cheers vivabob November 8, 2008, 07:00 PM I have remained very quiet about the recent bannings and have tried to avoid being drawn in to the whole debate (actually on the advice of someone who has been banned) But a few points i would like to make are - It is davids site and he has the right to let on who ever he wants to, much like a landlord in a pub , he has the right to say who drinks in his pub and who doesn't , i have tons of respect for david and the site he has set up and the people i have got to know, been put in touch with and learned things from. But A pub without customers is not much of a pub ... we have lost a few loyal members recently and it shows in some of the threads i used to enjoy reading , Grim and flax for their collecting information both people i have learned alot from , M23 who i know does like a debate (and is a passionate person who sometimes lets passion take over) has good reason for that , but does contribute a lot of morrissey related stories and information to the site as i am sure no one can deny , even recently by passing a story to uncle skinny to post shows his passion to talk about morrissey I have not had any personal issues with the moderators and dont feel i can comment on their actions , but i would like to make a request that the recent people that are banned and the people who look after the well being of the site try letting it lay , everyone makes individual appologys and agrees to bury the hatchett for the sake of the site and lets get back to normal it seems easy as Stephane rightly says , if you dont like someone ignore them Jukebox Jury November 8, 2008, 07:55 PM I too am caught up with friends on both sides, so all I can say is this.... Jukebox Jury I-NRriHlLUk Uncleskinny November 8, 2008, 07:58 PM I too am caught up with friends on both sides, so all I can say is this.... Jukebox Jury I-NRriHlLUk Amen to that. Peter davidt November 8, 2008, 07:59 PM I think it's time others try running a forum. While a user's positive contributions are appreciated, what do you do if that user harasses someone without end and can't handle that things are done their way? I have been lenient with long time members but some refuse to accept the way things are and eventually do something they know will get them be banned. I don't have time to babysit these people so unfortunately they made their own choice. Uncleskinny November 8, 2008, 08:10 PM I think it's time others try running a forum. While a user's positive contributions are appreciated, what do you do if that user harasses someone without end and can't handle that things are done their way? I have been lenient with long time members but some refuse to accept the way things are and eventually do something they know will get them be banned. I don't have time to babysit these people so unfortunately they made their own choice. Amen to this too. People need to remember that it's just an internet forum, not real life, and things users get away on this forum, they'd never dream of even attempting to get away with in real life. I wish people could be nice. Peter Jane Birkin November 8, 2008, 08:44 PM This thread is zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Anyone contributing to this thread is an idiot, including me. :D :D :D Now stop fighting and get on with your lives, because we all know that arguing on the internet is like taking part in the special olympics, even if you win, you're still retarded. (oh...and if anyone is offended by this joke, I'd like to apologise but I thought it was funny :p) Helen Bach November 8, 2008, 09:34 PM This thread is zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Anyone contributing to this thread is an idiot, including me. :D :D :D Now stop fighting and get on with your lives, because we all know that arguing on the internet is like taking part in the special olympics, even if you win, you're still retarded. (oh...and if anyone is offended by this joke, I'd like to apologise but I thought it was funny :p) We don't want your opinion about anything until you pay your tv licence. Jane Birkin November 8, 2008, 09:45 PM We don't want your opinion about anything until you pay your tv licence. lol but I do, honest guv'nor. the beast November 8, 2008, 09:48 PM I'm disappointed to see the military state that this place has become. Davidt, I think moderators also need a bit of moderating. Kewpie has been making many users here unhappy for at least a year, maybe more. She was bound to push some more hot blooded people over their limits. The way she is dealing with this situation is also the sign of a bad moderator. It took me forever to find out why Grim and co were banned because Kewpie never answered my questions about it, and when I did find out I was disappointed to learn of the reason (which was a bit radical, but in my opinion didn't deserve banning because it was more or less called for, and should have been dealt with a bit more sense of humour). I believe banning should be reserved for new users who come here immediately causing trouble, or for repeat offenders. I also think moderators should listen to the other users. I'm just saying all this as an outisde observer, because nobody has offended me personally. I find Kewpie's way to dealing with the threads a bit annoying, but I can live with it. The people who get on my nerves I can always just put on my ignore list. I just hate to see the people I like to meet here every day get banned. For moderate moderation... please. I don't want to see anybody else disappear. :clap::clap::clap::clap: Cassius November 9, 2008, 02:14 AM Out of nowhere it's http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/08/David%20Hasselhoff.jpg Dave2006 November 14, 2008, 09:35 AM Has Grim been un-banned now? - his avatar seems to have changed on his old posts and it no longer reads "banned" There's no new posts from him...but the avatar now says problem child"... Does he know? Jukebox Jury November 14, 2008, 09:51 AM Has Grim been un-banned now? - his avatar seems to have changed on his old posts and it no longer reads "banned" There's no new posts from him...but the avatar now says problem child"... Does he know? Grim sent me a text message last night when I was at the S&G Lads Club benefit gig. He asked me to buy him £10 worth of raffle tickets. he ended up winning a brand new Lads Club T-shirt:cool: Grim, if you are reading this...... send me the tenner and then I'll send you the shirt;):D Jukebox Jury Dave2006 November 14, 2008, 10:05 AM I thought the fund raiser was tonight! Me and a couple of mates are (were) planning on coming down. Bugger :mad: Best place a bid on ebay... Dave Grim sent me a text message last night when I was at the S&G Lads Club benefit gig. He asked me to buy him £10 worth of raffle tickets. he ended up winning a brand new Lads Club T-shirt:cool: Grim, if you are reading this...... send me the tenner and then I'll send you the shirt;):D Jukebox Jury Mr.Improper PIMP..mofo November 14, 2008, 10:05 AM I'm disappointed to see the military state that this place has become. Davidt, I think moderators also need a bit of moderating. Kewpie has been making many users here unhappy for at least a year, maybe more. She was bound to push some more hot blooded people over their limits. The way she is dealing with this situation is also the sign of a bad moderator. It took me forever to find out why Grim and co were banned because Kewpie never answered my questions about it, and when I did find out I was disappointed to learn of the reason (which was a bit radical, but in my opinion didn't deserve banning because it was more or less called for, and should have been dealt with a bit more sense of humour). I believe banning should be reserved for new users who come here immediately causing trouble, or for repeat offenders. I also think moderators should listen to the other users. I'm just saying all this as an outisde observer, because nobody has offended me personally. I find Kewpie's way to dealing with the threads a bit annoying, but I can live with it. The people who get on my nerves I can always just put on my ignore list. I just hate to see the people I like to meet here every day get banned. For moderate moderation... please. I don't want to see anybody else disappear. Great post Stephane! While I can honestly say, I don't shed a tear about Hugh getting the heave ho, I do think that Kewpie goes a bit overboard with her mod duties. You don't have to like me, and that's fine, I couldn't care less really. I'm a fan too, and although I'm a bit harsh at times, it's because I worship his PIMPship, and take offense to folks who go out of their way to trash him @ every chance they get. EVERYONE here who may not like me, and posters who do will agree on this: I've never said a bad word, comment, or anything else about his Majesty/his music, etc. That's quite a big deal to say/do that, as I've been posting here for the better part of 6-7 yrs now. I just cannot bring myself to do it, I just can't. Morrissey is the PIMP of the world, and his PIMPship should be celebrated you dig? his music, etc. Not trashed, and so forth. I see people here who trash Morrissey, and everything or anything that he or a label does, & those folks are allowed to continue posting here, yet, some folks, are not. Thats hypocrisy at it's finest. My point is, that Kewpie needs to be moderated as well, or at the very least, talked to and made aware of how things work here. Kewpie, while i dont know you personally, I do think you don't like alot of folks here, just my take though. You gave me an "infraction" not too long ago, and claimed i was trying to incite something here, when I clearly wasn't. I didn't curse or say anything bad in the post(which for me is a tough thing to do), just my take on the situation, and I got an "infraction" for it, which I think is total Bullshit. But, I guess I have to deal with it, don't I? I'm a big PIMP though, I can handle it. You don't have to like me, Which, I can assure you, I won't lose a wink of sleep over . Just pointing out the hypocrisy on the situation is all. Oh boy! Now I know I will receive another "Infraction" for that. (rollseyes) Oh my god, it's Robby! November 14, 2008, 11:56 AM My point is, that Kewpie needs to be moderated as well, or at the very least, talked to and made aware of how things work here. Kewpie, while i dont know you personally, I do think you don't like alot of folks here, just my take though. i am going to make the cop analogy again, the mods are cops here and cops rarely want to publicly criticize another cop, even one they may consider 'bad' or whatever http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y86/gulrober/tsktskog7.gif but often they handle things quietly and internally, its quite possible this has already taken place with Kewpie http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y86/gulrober/33.gif so why dont a lot of you join me in praying this is so :pray: and now just move the f on! http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y86/gulrober/1106ck8.gif ps: pimpie, i know you know i think you rock, sorry you got an infraction dude, i think you took it like the stud you are and am always happy to read your posts :D Grim O'Grady November 14, 2008, 02:54 PM Has Grim been un-banned now? - his avatar seems to have changed on his old posts and it no longer reads "banned" There's no new posts from him...but the avatar now says problem child"... Does he know? thank you dave, he does know but won't be posting on here anymore. thank you and good night. love GU *lifetime ban. lovemorrissey November 14, 2008, 03:41 PM I was just about to start moaning about the title of this thread as it made me shout "oh my god" out loud at work, but its been changed as we speak. Luv ya Grim!! :guitar: (glad you are still alive) lol Mr.Improper PIMP..mofo November 15, 2008, 08:15 AM ps: pimpie, i know you know i think you rock, sorry you got an infraction dude, i think you took it like the stud you are and am always happy to read your posts :D Appreciate that man, means alot. Some might not like the PIMP, but you can't deny, I'M ONE GIANT MOZ FAN, you dig? PIMP likes you too man. Not to mention, you dig the YO, so you're cool in my book. Just remember to wash it down with some orange drink from Mickey D's. roky April 17, 2009, 07:42 PM Where is good ol Grim? Did something happen to him? Why does he not post here anymore? sweet and tender hooligan April 17, 2009, 07:48 PM Where is good ol Grim? Did something happen to him? Why does he not post here anymore? He got banned. Kewpie April 17, 2009, 07:50 PM You have too much time to wonder people today. :rolleyes: Unfortunately Grim O'Glady and girlunafraid violated TOS, have been banned from the forums. In October 2009 site administrator will review either lift their ban. However, one of them actively trolling the forums returning with a new name which only makes harder to being reinstated. You find his contact email address from the following site's user profile: http://thewrongarms.proboards.com/index.cgi? Jukebox Jury April 17, 2009, 08:02 PM You have too much time to wonder people today. :rolleyes: Unfortunately Grim O'Glady and girlunafraid violated TOS, have been banned from the forums. In October 2009 site administrator will review either lift their ban. However, one of them actively trolling the forums returning with a new name which only makes harder to being reinstated. You find his contact email address from the following site's user profile: http://thewrongarms.proboards.com/index.cgi? Kewpie You sound like a dalek...... using words like ''Violated''. You say ''one of them actively trolling the forums returning with a new name.....'' is cobblers..... Yes, one of them returned with a new name and just made decent posts.... nothing offensive and nothing controversial.... YET there are quite a few posters on here who ARE trolling the forums who add absolutely NO worth at all to ANY forum on Morrissey-Solo - yet they are allowed to troll on without any questions asked......just because they do not ''violate'' TOS:rolleyes: Give me Grim and GU ANYDAY over boring non entities who no-one would even know was absent from the boards..... Having spoken to Grim, I wouldn't bother holding a kangeroo court later this year to ''discuss'' whether he is worthy to be allowed back here, I think he has found something else to occupy his time:guitar: Jukebox Jury Practising Troublemaker April 17, 2009, 08:05 PM Kewpie You sound like a dalek...... using words like ''Violated''. You say ''one of them actively trolling the forums returning with a new name.....'' is cobblers..... Yes, one of them returned with a new name and just made decent posts.... nothing offensive and nothing controversial.... YET there are quite a few posters on here who ARE trolling the forums who add absolutely NO worth at all to ANY forum on Morrissey-Solo - yet they are allowed to troll on without any questions asked......just because they do not ''violate'' TOS:rolleyes: Give me Grim and GU ANYDAY over boring non entities who no-one would even know was absent from the boards..... Having spoken to Grim, I wouldn't bother holding a kangeroo court later this year to ''discuss'' whether he is worthy to be allowed back here, I think he has found something else to occupy his time:guitar: Jukebox Jury Agreed Love PTxx. Jukebox Jury April 17, 2009, 08:08 PM You have too much time to wonder people today. :rolleyes: How very dare people on here have too much time to wonder things..... says the person who has too much time on her hands.....:rolleyes: Jukebox Jury No Place Like Rome April 17, 2009, 08:11 PM Agreed Love PTxx. It must be very dark where you are! Permanantly up jukebox jury's backside:rolleyes: Jukebox Jury April 17, 2009, 08:13 PM It must be very dark where you are! Permanantly up jukebox jury's backside:rolleyes: shut up... you are just jealous coz you'll never be there:p Jukebox Jury modrevolve April 17, 2009, 08:14 PM I miss Grim O'Grady and Morrisseythe23rd :straightface: JJ please give them my best jete tes devoirs au feu April 17, 2009, 08:15 PM http://www.ultimatepartyshop.com/shopimages/products/normal/96777.jpg Calm down, calm down! Jukebox Jury April 17, 2009, 08:23 PM I miss Grim O'Grady and Morrisseythe23rd :straightface: JJ please give them my best I'm not sure if contacting them and passing on messages from this site is a violation of TOS:squiffy: Jukebox Jury Flax April 17, 2009, 08:24 PM Give me Grim and GU ANYDAY over boring non entities Agree!!! Jukebox Jury April 17, 2009, 08:28 PM Agree!!! But Flax.... I had you down as one of the boring non........ only kidding:thumb: Jukebox Jury jete tes devoirs au feu April 17, 2009, 08:32 PM You know, just because you're busom buddies with someone from here in real life doesn't automatically make the rest of us "boring non-entities". blue jag April 17, 2009, 08:35 PM It must be very dark where you are! Permanantly up jukebox jury's backside:rolleyes: You know when I've had a few I can't work out who the fuck said what in the first place!:confused: No Place Like Rome April 17, 2009, 08:36 PM You know when I've had a few I can't work out who the fuck said what in the first place!:confused: Here's a clue! You've quoted that comment so it is me who said that:thumb: vivabob April 17, 2009, 08:40 PM I miss grim and M23 too , they brought a bit of life to the place ... that cannot be denied :highfive: I am a Ghost April 17, 2009, 08:42 PM Hope to see the laddies next month :thumb: Flax April 17, 2009, 08:42 PM But Flax.... I had you down as one of the boring non........ only kidding:thumb: Jukebox Jury http://www.exodus-alliance.com/images/delete.jpg Practising Troublemaker April 17, 2009, 08:44 PM It must be very dark where you are! Permanantly up jukebox jury's backside:rolleyes: :ha-no: Love PTxx. bysshe April 17, 2009, 09:48 PM Hope to see the laddies next month :thumb: Pass along my greetings and salutations, plz! Kthx! :) I am a Ghost April 17, 2009, 10:37 PM Pass along my greetings and salutations, plz! Kthx! :) I will :) Jukebox Jury April 18, 2009, 05:54 PM I thought I'd bump this thread up again..... just to piss Kewpie off:rofl: Jukebox Jury Flax May 11, 2009, 10:46 AM I thought I'd bump this thread up again..... just to piss Kewpie off:rofl: Jukebox Jury Tell him I said hello :) and that he should come back Moonbeam May 11, 2009, 11:54 AM Hasn't been the same on here since his banning :mad: Jukebox Jury May 11, 2009, 11:56 AM Hasn't been the same on here since his banning :mad: Yes, it's been so much better:D Jukebox Jury Moonbeam May 11, 2009, 11:56 AM :D I know you don't mean that! I am a Ghost May 11, 2009, 12:04 PM Grim=Ledge. GlasgowChivas May 11, 2009, 12:12 PM I had the pleasure of meeting Grim - very briefly - last Thursday at the Barrowlands. He was accompanied by the lovely GirlUnafraid. Nothing more than a handshake and a how you doing but it was clear that the man is held in high regard by fellow solo-ers. Also met Morrissey The 23rd too - what can I say; the man has some stories to tell. A true pleasure. GC Jukebox Jury May 11, 2009, 01:12 PM I had the pleasure of meeting Grim - very briefly - last Thursday at the Barrowlands. He was accompanied by the lovely GirlUnafraid. Nothing more than a handshake and a how you doing but it was clear that the man is held in high regard by fellow solo-ers. Also met Morrissey The 23rd too - what can I say; the man has some stories to tell. A true pleasure. GC Did they film the gig?:D Jukebox Jury modrevolve May 11, 2009, 01:15 PM if so can I get a copy :guitar: :D Did they film the gig?:D Jukebox Jury Uncleskinny May 11, 2009, 04:01 PM I like Grim. I like Grim's missus too. Peter vivabob May 11, 2009, 10:20 PM Did they film the gig?:D Jukebox Jury no but i have a rather excellent video of M23 in the boozer as young virtually dead will back up ....in it he scares a a small punk band , a mean feat for one laddy all I need is moz May 18, 2009, 12:06 PM no but i have a rather excellent video of M23 in the boozer as young virtually dead will back up ....in it he scares a a small punk band , a mean feat for one laddy Sounds interesting?:confused: Sorry I did'nt mean to bump this thread, just got bored, thought I'd go threw some of the older posts:D Walkers Crisp May 18, 2009, 08:45 PM I certainly DO miss Grimbo, GU and M23 'round here. They're truly fabulous people. Since their ban this hasn't been the same place. Hellie May 18, 2009, 08:56 PM I liked Grim.He had a lot to say.:thumb: Kewpie May 18, 2009, 08:58 PM FYI, sadly Grim and M23 tested David's patience for ages which is outrageous. Finally when they crossed the line, David and Peter had to take action against them. According to Jukebox Jury, Grim isn't interested in coming back after his ban would be lifted. You can still in touch with them outside of the forums. Good luck to them. Walkers Crisp May 18, 2009, 10:25 PM Golden threads don't break easily. :D Moonbeam May 18, 2009, 10:29 PM FYI, sadly Grim and M23 tested David's patience for ages which is outrageous. You can still in touch with them outside of the forums. Aw sure you don't mind? Thanks! :rolleyes: Flax May 18, 2009, 10:32 PM FYI, sadly Grim and M23 tested David's patience for ages which is outrageous. Finally when they crossed the line, David and Peter had to take action against them. According to Jukebox Jury, Grim isn't interested in coming back after his ban would be lifted. You can still in touch with them outside of the forums. Good luck to them. wow... that is really outrageous! Who would daaaaaare disturb Mr. David in any way? Bananed! Bananed! Bananed! Bananed! Bananed! nowherefast944 May 18, 2009, 10:53 PM wow... that is really outrageous! Who would daaaaaare disturb Mr. David in any way? Bananed! Bananed! Bananed! Bananed! Bananed! god forbid David start a forum for people to join and talk. if kewpie had it its way, no one would post anything and just read threads from 4 years ago Flax May 28, 2009, 05:42 PM I thought this thread had been archived... I'm glad it's back. I like it. :) Black Eyed May 28, 2009, 06:44 PM I met Grim outside the Apollo and must say what an absoloutely fab fella he is. I only had his interesting and witty posts to go by and yet he lived up to all expectations. :) Got a lovely hug and kiss from him aswell :D:rolleyes: Oh my god, it's Robby! June 26, 2009, 09:11 PM its a shame, but i totally forgot what grim and his cell were banned for in the 1st place :confused: i mean i get the whole lifetime ban for betting on baseball thing* :rolleyes:, but b4 that i got nothing :o *=see pete rose 4more411 Jukebox Jury June 26, 2009, 09:23 PM I met Grim outside the Apollo and must say what an absoloutely fab fella he is. Got a lovely hug and kiss from him aswell :D:rolleyes: Did you get any STD's a few weeks later:rofl: Jukebox Jury Flax July 19, 2009, 03:08 PM http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/crazy_panda/panda-1.jpg Jukebox Jury July 19, 2009, 03:44 PM http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/crazy_panda/panda-1.jpg :confused::confused: Jukebox Jury vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
|